The feeder insect industry plays a vital role in the pet trade, particularly for reptile and amphibian enthusiasts who rely on insects like crickets and roaches as a primary food source for their pets. As demand for feeder insects grows, the industry, valued in the billions globally, supplies a wide array of insects to feed various exotic pets (Anankware et al., 2015). However, the industry faces significant challenges from disease outbreaks that can decimate insect populations, leading to both financial losses and compromised safety and quality of the products delivered to pet owners. Annual losses due to fungal, bacterial, and parasitic diseases affecting these insects are substantial, threatening both profits and the consistency of supply (Nyombe et al., 2024). Understanding these diseases is crucial to mitigating risk and maintaining a stable and reliable feeder insect trade.

The Rise of Feeder Insects

Feeder insects like crickets, roaches, and worms have become a staple food for a wide range of exotic pets. As the demand for these insects increases, the feeder insect industry has grown into a multi-billion-dollar global business. However, the industry is vulnerable to disease outbreaks, which can not only impact insect populations but also disrupt the supply chain and affect the nutritional quality of the insects consumed by pet reptiles and amphibians.

Common Diseases Affecting Feeder Insects

Several pathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasitic organisms threaten the health of crickets, roaches, and other feeder insects. Here’s a closer look at the most common species and their impact on insect populations:

Bacterial Infections

Bacillus thuringiensis

  • Description: Bacillus thuringiensis is a bacterium commonly used as a natural pesticide. While effective in pest control, when present in high concentrations, it can infect feeder insects, leading to gastrointestinal issues and death (Roh et al., 2007).
  • Hosts: Crickets, roaches, and other insects
  • Symptoms: Gastrointestinal issues, weight loss, and death in overexposed insects.

 

Fungal Infections

Beauveria bassiana

  • Description: Beauveria bassiana is an entomopathogenic fungus that infects insects by growing inside their bodies. Although used for pest control, it can cause severe damage when it infects high-density populations of feeder insects (Araújo et al., 2016).
  • Hosts: Crickets, roaches, and many other insects
  • Symptoms: Lethargy, body distortion, and death.

Metarhizium anisopliae

  • Description: Metarhizium anisopliae is another fungus commonly used in biological pest control. However, in feeder insects, it infects the exoskeleton and internal organs, often leading to visible signs of body decay (Araújo et al., 2016).
  • Hosts: Roaches, crickets, and others
  • Symptoms: Body decay, loss of mobility, and death. The fungus often leaves orange-colored growths on the insect’s body.

Conidiobolus spp.

  • Description: Conidiobolus species are fungal pathogens that can severely affect insect populations, particularly crickets and roaches. These fungi cause deformations and hinder the insects’ ability to function normally (Araújo et al., 2016).
  • Hosts: Crickets and roaches
  • Symptoms: Severe body deformation, loss of appendage functionality, and death.

Parasitic Eukaryotes

Gregarines (Protozoan Parasites)

  • Description: Gregarines are protozoan parasites that infect the digestive systems of their insect hosts. They can significantly affect the insects’ growth and ability to feed, reducing their nutritional value (Gałęcki et al., 2019).
  • Hosts: Crickets, roaches, and other insects
  • Symptoms: Lethargy, reduced growth, and death. These parasites hinder the insect’s ability to consume food and grow properly.

Nematodes (e.g., Steinernema spp.)

  • Description: Steinernema species are parasitic nematodes that infect insects, leading to paralysis and death. These parasites can also degrade the nutritional profile of the affected insect (Gałęcki et al., 2019).
  • Hosts: Crickets and other insects
  • Symptoms: Swelling, paralysis, and eventual death.

How Pathogens from Contaminated Insects Can Be Transmitted to Exotic Pets

Diseases affecting feeder insects are not just a threat to insect populations, they can also be transmitted to exotic pets. When reptiles and amphibians consume infected insects, they may become exposed to harmful pathogens, leading to illness or even death.

When a pet consumes an infected insect, the pathogen (such as bacteria, fungi, or parasites) can enter the pet’s digestive system. This can cause gastrointestinal issues or, in some cases, systemic infections that harm the pet. Protozoan parasites like Cryptosporidium can be ingested by pets and establish themselves in the pet’s gut (Mitchell, 2007). This can lead to internal infections that affect the pet’s health and growth.

The Importance of a Healthy Diet and Disease-Free Feeder Insects

Ensuring that the feeder insects provided to reptiles and amphibians are disease-free is essential to maintaining their health. This is why monitoring the health of feeder insects and practicing strict biosecurity measures in insect farming are vital to prevent the spread of harmful pathogens. By choosing trusted suppliers and ensuring that the insects are properly farmed and handled, pet owners can reduce the risk of disease transmission and ensure that their pets receive the safest, most nutritious diet possible.

Using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) to Monitor Feeder Insect Populations and Prevent Disease Spread

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is revolutionizing how the feeder insect industry monitors the health of insect populations and detects pathogens before they cause widespread outbreaks. By sequencing the DNA of crickets and roaches, NGS can identify a range of viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites—even in the absence of visible symptoms. This early detection enables producers to take swift action, preventing significant damage to insect populations.

NGS allows for whole genome sequencing, identification of specific microbial species, and tracking genetic markers linked to disease resistance or susceptibility. Regular sequencing helps monitor microbial diversity, assess pathogen presence, and implement targeted interventions. Moreover, NGS data can reveal environmental factors contributing to pathogen outbreaks, enabling insect farmers to optimize their farming practices and minimize disease transmission. By adopting NGS, the feeder insect industry can enhance biosecurity, improve insect health, and create a more stable and sustainable supply chain.

Mitigating the Impact of Insect Disease on the Feeder Industry

The threat of disease in feeder insect populations is significant, impacting both insect health and the profitability of businesses that rely on them. Implementing strict biosecurity measures—such as maintaining clean, dry conditions, closely monitoring insect health, and using probiotics and natural remedies to manage diseases—can help mitigate pathogen spread. Additionally, understanding the specific needs of different insect species can improve farming conditions and reduce disease outbreaks.

Preventing disease outbreaks is essential not only for protecting industry profits but also for ensuring the safety and nutritional value of insects used to feed pet reptiles and amphibians. A healthy feeder insect population is crucial for the well-being of pets and the businesses that provide for them.

References

  • Anankware, P. J., Fening, K. O., Osekre, E., & Obeng-Ofori, D. (2015). Insects as food and feed: A review. International Journal of Agricultural Research and Review3(1), 143-151.
  • Araújo, J. P., & Hughes, D. P. (2016). Diversity of entomopathogenic fungi: which groups conquered the insect body?. Advances in genetics94, 1-39.
  • Benson, K. G. (1999, April). Reptilian gastrointestinal diseases. In Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine (Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 90-97). WB Saunders.
  • Gałęcki, R., & Sokół, R. (2019). A parasitological evaluation of edible insects and their role in the transmission of parasitic diseases to humans and animals. PloS one, 14(7), e0219303.
  • Mitchell, M. A. (2007). Parasites of reptiles. Flynn’s parasites of laboratory animals, 177-216.
  • Nyombe, R. P. M., Odhiambo, B., & Bulli, P. (2024). Bacterial and fungal microbes associated with cricket rearing systems in the tropics. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 1(aop), 1-14.
  • Roh, J. Y., Choi, J. Y., Li, M. S., Jin, B. R., & Je, Y. H. (2007). Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology17(4), 547-559.

Categories: Bacterial Infections, Fungal Infections, Gastrointestinal Health, Next-Gen DNA Sequencing Technology, Pet Health, Safety and Wellness, Reptiles/Amphibians

animal diagnostics

Validated by Veterinarians

“Clients expect their veterinarians to stay up to date on all matters that affect the health and well being of their non-human family members. The current technique that we have used to determine the presence and antibiotic sensitivity of organisms causing disease in our pets is over a century old.

With the emergence of dangerous antibacterial resistance, it is critical that veterinarians are able to offer laser focused diagnostics and treatment. MiDog enables us to offer care that exceeds the typical standard of care.”

Bernadine Cruz, DVM, Laguna Hills Animal Hospital Laguna Woods, CA

“I love the absolute abundance and comparing the fungal with bacterial infection. I do not worry as much about getting a false negative urinary infection reading as I do with traditional urine cultures. Several times the same urine would culture negative but MiDOG would detect pathogens.”

Michael Morgan, DVMQuail Animal Hospital, Tustin, CA

“The MiDOG All-in-One Test is amazing, I would use it instead of culture and sensitivity.  Such rapid and detailed results, I will reach for MiDOG before culture next time!

Thank you very much MiDOG, for sharing the opportunity to try your technology.”

Martha Smith-Blackmore, DVM, President of Forensic Veterinary Investigations, LLC – Boston, MA

The MiDOG All-in-One Microbial Test is our new gold standard of pathogen identification. The results are so accurate and valuable – especially with assessing both bacterial and fungal infections with the same sample.

Thank you MiDOG!”

Kathy Wentworth, DVM, Diplomate ABVP Canine and Feline Practice – PetPoint Medical Center, Irvine, CA

“The MiDOG staff was extremely helpful and supportive.”

Cathy Curtis, DVM – London, UK

“I have had great results using the MiDOG® Test. Compared to traditional culture tests, I am better able to target the treatment for dogs because the MiDOG® Test is so sensitive that it identifies all pathogens including bacteria and fungi, as well as antibiotic sensitivity.

The cost and turnaround time are about the same as a culture test, but I get much more data. The test has great performance and I believe the NGS technology will be a game changer for veterinarians treating dogs with lesions or other infections.”

Michael Kavanagh, DVM, Practice owner – Saddleback Animal Hospital, Tustin, CA

“It’s helpful to have an NGS spectrum because it gives you a broader insight of what’s happening and what might be going on.”

Richard Harvey BVSc DVD DipECVD PhD FRSB FRCVS – European Specialist in Veterinary Dermatology – Head of Dermatology, Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service – Solihull, England UK

“I have been using MiDog for over 4 years now and exclusively as my test of choice for all cultures for 3 years.  It is so great to submit a culture and feel confident there will be a result when it comes back, especially for urine cultures.  The reports were intimidating at first because they contain so much information.  After the first few, I am now quickly able to glance over it and pick out the highlights.  I can then come back later and pour over all the details.  I have been extremely pleased with my patients’ results using the test as well.  I don’t envision ever going back to traditional culture and susceptibilities again.”

Brian M. Urmson, DVM, Columbiana Veterinary Associates

“As an exotic veterinarian, there are numerous tests we have to consider to check specific bacterial and fungal organisms based on the species. MiDOG eliminates the need for many of these separate samples and provides definitive results quickly to help us treat our patients more efficiently and effectively. The lab is wonderful to work with and has never rejected our samples- they even processed a lizard toe we amputated and determined the cause of skin infection.”

Dr. Melissa Giese, Chicago Exotics Animal Hospital

“MiDOG’s diagnostic approach offers the unique ability to identify pathogens that evade traditional culture and sensitivity testing. I have found that adding a molecular based testing approach in the form of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) from MiDOG to my routine diagnostic cultures can be extremely helpful in the identification and diagnosis of uncommon pathogens in veterinary medicine.”

Dr. Wayne Rosenkrantz, Animal Dermatology Clinic – Tustin

“She [Dr. Krumbeck] really did a great job of making complicated concepts accessible and demonstrating the value of your services. I’m really looking forward to working with MiDOG on my research project!”

Dr. Yaicha Peters, Animal Dermatology Clinic – San Diego

“As a proud collaborator with MiDOG, I deeply appreciate their dedication to fostering partnerships between industry and veterinary experts. Their commitment to enhancing diagnostic quality for veterinarians is commendable. In my experience, their support has been invaluable, earning them a ‘Double A+, Triple Star’ rating. Their assistance has been faultless, contributing significantly to the success of my projects and studies. I eagerly anticipate our continued collaboration.”

Dr. Richard Harvey, BVSc DVD DipECVD PhD FRSB FRCVS; European Specialist in Veterinary Dermatology

“We’re seeing that, if we prescribe too many antibiotics or they’re taken too frequently, animals are developing inappropriate or pathogenic strains of bacteria. We’re also seeing that our antibiotics are just not working against them anymore… It’s a good example of why we need better diagnostic testing, like MiDOG, so that we’re selecting the correct antibiotic every time our patients have an infection.”

Dr. Alissa Rexo, DVM, CVA, DACVD, Mid-Atlantic Veterinary Dermatology

“The NGS technique as offered by MiDOG is wonderful because pathogens like Melissococcus plutonius, for example, are difficult to grow and keep alive in the laboratory. A standard laboratory cannot truly examine or even properly diagnose this pathogen in bee hives at this time. But with NGS, we can reliably diagnose it.”

Dr. Joerg Mayer, Entomologist and Microbiologist at the University of Georgia

“For me, as a clinician and as a researcher, I see the immense value in the product [the All-in-One Test]. I have had great success using MiDOG clinically, including identifying Mycoplasma in a 24 year old pigeon, a Nannizziopsis spp in a ball python from a large pet distributor, Mycoplasma and Fusobacterium necrophorum co-infection in a peacock, and to identify an abnormal gut GI in a technician’s dog that tested negative for everything else (but we were able to establish what was abnormal, and work toward fixing it).”

Dr. Jeremy Rayl – Veterinarian, Block House Creek Animal Hospital, Cedar Park, Texas

“With MiDog results I not only receive a list of organisms detected in the sample, but also cell counts which allow me to target the most abundant pathogens or the most pathogenic. The identification of antimicrobial resistance genes is also helpful in selecting an appropriate antibiotic. Another benefit is that sample handling is less prone to risk of overgrowth and is stable at room temperature. Easy and informative. A great tool in our diagnostic toolbox!!”

Lauren Palmer DVM, MPH, Marine mammal Care Center Los Angeles

“If every rescue and sanctuary could run a scan on new admissions, I think it would open everyone’s eyes. These birds have been through so much and damaged by human pathogens. Plus the MiDog test was much more affordable than a battery of PCRs, several c&s, repeated tests, etc. AND non-invasive. Thank you. I would advise every sanctuary and other parrot facility to run MiDOG screening. I know it might reveal more than we want to know.”

Patricia Latas, DVM, Wild Parrot Coalition